DOI: /10.25592/dgs.corpus-3.0-type-77303

UNIFORM-$CANDIDATE-NUE35^


UNIFORM-$CANDIDATE-NUE35^
Nürnberg (Nuremberg) | dgskorpus_nue_03 | 31-45m   Let me ask you a question: Can you imagine traveling through Europe, and people using the same sign language everywhere?
rIMAGINATION1A*CAN1EUROPE1AUNIFORM-$CANDIDATE-NUE35^EQUAL8*TO-SIGN1G
l
mvorstellenkanneuropa
Nürnberg (Nuremberg) | dgskorpus_nue_03 | 31-45m   Are you in favor of one common sign language in Europe?
rEUROPE1A$INDEX1IMAGINATION1A*UNIFORM-$CANDIDATE-NUE35^$GEST^
l
meuropa
Nürnberg (Nuremberg) | dgskorpus_nue_03 | 31-45m   But I can’t imagine a common sign language enshrined in law.
rREALLY2*TO-ACKNOWLEDGE1STATUTE1BUNIFORM-$CANDIDATE-NUE35^I1CAN2A^*IMAGINATION1A*
l
meinheitkann nichtvorstellen
Nürnberg (Nuremberg) | dgskorpus_nue_03 | 31-45m   Look, that’s the advantage of the United States: The country extends over the whole continent, and people use one common language there.
rHEADING1^HEADING1^*USA2UNIFORM-$CANDIDATE-NUE35^
l
mu-s-a
Nürnberg (Nuremberg) | dgskorpus_nue_03 | 31-45m   In my opinion, a common sign language is not possible.
rTO-STAY3*UNIFORM-$CANDIDATE-NUE35^POSSIBLE2*I1
l
meinheit
Nürnberg (Nuremberg) | dgskorpus_nue_03 | 31-45m   Well, it would be difficult to have a common language for everyone.
r$GEST^UNIFORM-$CANDIDATE-NUE35^RENT1^
l
meinheitlichschwer
Nürnberg (Nuremberg) | dgskorpus_nue_03 | 31-45m   I don’t think a common sign language will be constituted.
rALL3*$GEST-OFF^MY1*UNIFORM-$CANDIDATE-NUE35^POSSIBLE1*
l
meinheitlich
Nürnberg (Nuremberg) | dgskorpus_nue_03 | 31-45m   Grade specific school books are the same in Germany.
rBOOK1B*FUTURE1BEQUAL8*UNIFORM-$CANDIDATE-NUE35^
l
mzukunft[MG]einheitlich
Nürnberg (Nuremberg) | dgskorpus_nue_03 | 31-45m   For instance schools in Hesse don’t have their own books, instead they have the same all over Germany in all of the states now.
rTO-BELONG1NOT-ANYMORE1AFUTURE1B*UNIFORM-$CANDIDATE-NUE35^
l
mnicht mehrzukunfteinheitlich
Nürnberg (Nuremberg) | dgskorpus_nue_03 | 31-45m   It should be standardized in Germany; I’m in favor of that.
rOVER-OR-ABOUT1UNIFORM-$CANDIDATE-NUE35^I1FOR1GERMAN1
l
müberein{heitlich}dafürdeutsch
Nürnberg (Nuremberg) | dgskorpus_nue_03 | 31-45m   It should be standardized in Germany; I’m in favor of that.
rI1FOR1GERMAN1UNIFORM-$CANDIDATE-NUE35^
l
mdafürdeutscheinheitlich
Nürnberg (Nuremberg) | dgskorpus_nue_03 | 31-45m   I'm obviously in favor of having a standardized sign language in Germany.
rGERMAN1COUNTRY1A*UNIFORM-$CANDIDATE-NUE35^OF-COURSE1A*I1FOR1*
l
mdeutscheinheitlichdafür
Nürnberg (Nuremberg) | dgskorpus_nue_03 | 31-45m   I am, however, in favor of standardized signs in Germany.
r$ORAL^TO-SAY1UNIFORM-$CANDIDATE-NUE35^CLEAR1B*FOR1*$GEST-OFF^
l
mabereinheitlichklarfür
Nürnberg (Nuremberg) | dgskorpus_nue_03 | 31-45m   I think a common sign language would only be possible amongst deaf people.
rCAN2AIMAGINATION1A*I1UNIFORM-$CANDIDATE-NUE35^*ONLY2ADEAF1A*EVERYWHERE1*
l
mkannvorstelleneinheitnur

Report Mistakes